
Simulate adversary techniques to validate security visibility, detection effectiveness, SOC performance, and incident response capabilities.
Organizations invest significantly in SIEM, EDR/XDR, NDR, SOAR, firewalls, identity security, cloud security, and SOC operations. However, deploying security technologies does not guarantee that malicious activity will be detected or properly handled. Our Adversary Simulation Services execute controlled adversary techniques within the agreed scope and trace each activity through the organization's security monitoring and response ecosystem. This enables organizations to identify exactly where their defensive capabilities are effective and where gaps exist.
See what Adversary Simulation Services delivers and how it fits your environment.
Talk to an Adversary Simulation ExpertAdversary Simulation Services use controlled cyberattack techniques to test whether an organization's security technologies and SOC teams can see, detect, investigate, and respond to realistic malicious activity.
No. Penetration testing primarily focuses on identifying and exploiting vulnerabilities. Adversary Simulation focuses on defensive effectiveness — determining whether attack activity generates telemetry, triggers the appropriate detection, produces a meaningful alert, and receives an effective SOC response.
Yes. The service can assess the complete SOC response process, including alert acknowledgement, investigation, classification, escalation, containment, documentation, and response.
We identify the visibility gap and determine potential causes such as missing audit policies, disabled logging, insufficient endpoint telemetry, missing log-source integrations, or security configuration gaps.
This indicates a potential detection coverage gap. We determine whether an appropriate detection rule or security control exists and identify opportunities to improve detection using the available telemetry.
We assess whether the assigned severity accurately represents the risk of the simulated activity. Incorrect prioritization can result in important security events being delayed or overlooked by analysts.
Yes. Where agreed SLAs exist, we can measure whether alerts are acknowledged, investigated, escalated, and responded to within the expected timelines.
Yes. We evaluate whether analysts correctly understood the activity, conducted an appropriate investigation, escalated where necessary, and took suitable response or containment actions.
Yes. Simulated techniques can be mapped to MITRE ATT&CK, providing a structured view of tested attack behaviors and defensive coverage.
Yes. The service can validate the effectiveness of SIEM, EDR/XDR, NDR, SOAR, identity security, firewalls, cloud security, and other monitoring technologies involved in detecting and responding to simulated activity.
Protect your organization with enterprise-grade cybersecurity, cloud, and managed IT solutions tailored to your business needs.